SC - Re: Alcohol & the SCA - Apol

[Donna J. White]

It isn't just your post, M'Lady.m I have recieved numerous private eMail
messages from members of this list that have been overtly offensive.  Not
just now, but over the entire period of time I have belonged to this
list.  I have just had it up to my eyeballs with the hypocrisy.  I
figured by going pulbic on teh entire site, I could kill all the birds
who had been stoning me and let a few others know this kind of behavior 
is degrading to the entire populace of teh Society.  You were not meant
to be pointed out as the sole person involved.  Your message in which you
tried to explain did not arrive until after I ranted on.  I could not
take it into consideration, then.  I apologize for offending you.


On Fri, 18 Jul 1997 13:06:51 -0400 (EDT) Bronwynmgn at aol.com writes:
>In a message dated 97-07-18 10:03:33 EDT, you write:
>
><< Look I have about had enough of the implications that what happens 
>in one
> kingdom or area has no influence anywhere else and, therefore, should 
>not
> be discussed.  This is an Ansteorra list and Texas is relevant.
> 
> Thank you for the laughs but I think I have been insulted for the 
>last
> time.
> 
> 
> ----------
> > From: Bronwynmgn at aol.com
> > To: sca-cooks at Ansteorra.ORG
> > Subject: Re: SC - Re: Alcohol & the SCA
> > Date: Wednesday, July 16, 1997 7:25 AM
> > 
> > In a message dated 97-07-15 19:36:22 EDT, you write:
> > 
> > << The new rulings indicate that even passing the hat for supplies
> >  constitutes sale of an alcoholic beverage >>
> > 
> > To which new rulings are you referring, my lady?  The ruling from 
>the BoD
> > specifically mentions only the use of official SCA funds, which are 
>not
> what
> > one would be collecting if passing the hat.
> > Are there some new rulings in Texas that those of us who live 
>elsewhere
> would
> > not be aware of?
> > 
> > Brangwayan Morgan
>  >>
>My lady, I am most sorry if you felt that I was saying that rulings 
>that
>affect Texas as a state had nothing to do with the SCA.  I simply 
>stated the
>fact that those of us who DO NOT live in Texas are not aware of the 
>state
>laws there.  I live in Pennsylvania and have never been to Texas, so 
>there is
>no way I would know about a new law in Texas.  I was simply trying to
>clarify, for myself and others reading this list, whether you were 
>talking
>about state law or the SCA ruling, since your initial post did not 
>specify.
>I had no intent to insult you, and in fact thought that I had taken 
>extra
>care to be courteous as you had been upset by my previous post.
>
>Brangwayna Morgan 
>To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message 
>to
>SCA-Cooks-Request with the message body of unsubscribe.
>
>============================================================================
>
To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
SCA-Cooks-Request with the message body of unsubscribe.

============================================================================