SC - cuskynoles, continued...
Alderton, Philippa
phlip at morganco.net
Fri Oct 31 19:57:58 PST 1997
Adamantius,
While I can't speak for anyone else, I've been observing the cuskynole
debate with interest, and not a little amusement at times. Since I know
nothing about the subject, I've been keeping my mouth shut. Although I also
have little interest in making the things, I've found the debate to be of
interest simply from the point of view of the process of redacting a recipe.
Along the lines of Courtesy, perhaps, in addition to treating new or
inexperienced members a bit less brusquely, those who wish to become
discussion police might consider that their disinterest may be someone
else's interest. After all, as has been said before, there is a delete key.
Phlip
Never a horse that cain't be rode,
And never a rider that cain't be throwed.
- ----------
> LrdRas at aol.com wrote:
> >
> > In a message dated 97-10-30 14:45:44 EST, you write:
> >
> > << But will we still be able to decipher the recipe when they are
through,
> >>
> >
> > I would like to point out that keeping such a discussion public also
allows
> > others their input. If a recipe redaction is to degenerate to the level
> where
> > only 2 parties are commenting or to the point where the 2 parties are
> > ignoring other peoples comments and input into the redaction process
then
> the
> > list surely is not the forum for it and no matter how interesting the
> > conversation it should indeed, IMO, be taken private..
>
> It was in consideration the feelings of the other members of this list
> that I asked folks if our little discusssion on the cuskynoles recipe
> should be taken private. So far I have only heard two or three specific
> replies, which all said that it should not be removed from the list. On
> the other hand, reading between the lines, I'm getting the feeling that
> there may be a non-vocal majority with views to the contrary.
>
> So, folks, as still occasionally have to say to my six-year-old, USE
> YOUR WORDS! People have a hard enough time interpreting explicit
> statements on this list, without being expected to read minds.
>
> I am glad, though, that others are beginning to make some comments about
> this topic, once the initial few posts had passed.
>
> Adamantius
> ______________________________________
> Phil & Susan Troy
> troy at asan.com
>
============================================================================
>
> To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
> Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".
>
>
============================================================================
============================================================================
To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".
============================================================================
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list