SC - head cook vs. feastocrat

[Par Leijonhufvud]

On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Philip & Susan Troy wrote:

> In response to this and to my previous post about the architriclinus,
> cuisinier, and kitchener, I should add that I am not really in favor of
> uniform standards of terminology in this matter...one of the major
> points of the SCA is an interest in diversity, after all.

Of course. While the SCA (in the US) has a tendency to be monolingual, 
the MA of course weren't. I was sort of more stating that if it is a 
documentable period title, then it is, in one way, perfectly acceptable. 

The 'ocrat terminology is totally undocumentable before AS I, to the best 
of my knowledge.

/UlfR

- --
Par Leijonhufvud                  par.leijonhufvud at labtek.ki.se 
Hackers do it in LaTeX!
============================================================================

To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".

============================================================================