SC - Brandu-:-) -OT

[Louise Sugar]

hey folks....how about we move this discussion over to the distilling list
and leave the poor cooks alone  :D  I can just see them pulling their toques
down over their ears as we argue the legality of discussing distillation  ;D

Dragonfyr  (yes it is hosted on my server but Brandu is STILL List Admin
:D  )

|               SCA-Distilling Discussion Group                |
|       to subscribe, send Email to Majordomo at tycho.com      |
| with this message in the body:  subscribe sca-distilling


- -----Original Message-----
From: Peters, Rise J. <PETERSR at spiegel.becltd.com>
To: sca-cooks at Ansteorra.ORG <sca-cooks at Ansteorra.ORG>
Date: Wednesday, January 07, 1998 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: SC - Brandu-:-) -OT


>In a message dated 98-01-07 09:54:04 EST, Ras wrote:
>
>>> On the 11
>lists I subscribe to nearly everyone had refence to this ot that is illegal
>yesterday. Not a single reference ot such supposed illegal activity
>specified
>"in the USA" and all of them have international members. What a hoot!
>
>>>If I tho't there was any problem with you or your list <sca-distilling> I
>would simply unsubscribe. You do a bang-up job with distilling. ;-) Besides
>I
>tho't Puck was the BAFT agent...<glancing about innocently>
>
>>>Ras (who after all is mundanely an employee of the Pennsylvania Liquor
>Control
>Board and who agrees with Thomas Jefferson that a citizen is under no
>obligation to obey a bad law.)
>
>
>I'd also add that there was an earlier post that referred to "incitement"
to
>criminal activity as being outside First Amendment protections.  My general
>impression is that "incitement" under the case law requires the equivalent
>of "let's go burn the house down, come on, let's go!" or "string him up,
>there's a tree!"  There was a recent case involving incitement in which a
>book on how to perform contract killings was held to lie outside First
>Amendment protections, and that case does support the proposition that
>"here's details on how to get away with an illegal act" is unprotected
>speech.  But there's a difference between details on how to kill people and
>get away with it and, for example, a simple assertion that the federal
>government is unlikely to catch on to very small-scale distilling.
>
>But I'd agree that we get bogged down in discussions of legality, usually
>begun and concluded by non-experts, much more often than is desirable.  And
>since criminal law, health codes, and the like vary as much between states
>as they do between the US and other jurisdictions, it rarely profits us
>much.
>
>Rise (who plays a lawyer as her day job)
>
>
>===========================================================================
=
>
>To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
>Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".
>
>===========================================================================
=
>
>===========================================================================
=
>
>To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
>Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".
>
>===========================================================================
=

============================================================================

To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".

============================================================================