SC - re: the FAQ
kat
kat at kagan.com
Mon Jul 20 13:40:25 PDT 1998
My apologies if anyone else has already made this suggestion; I'm still about 3 digests behind...
Would it be a lot of trouble if, after each section in the FAQ debunking a particular assumption, a reference to one or more *specific* sections of the Florilegium dealing with the topic were given? i.e.:
"Grmflats are not period."
"Actually, <discussion discussion discussion>. For more information, check the Florilegium at www.pbm.com/~lindahl/rialto/grmflats.msg"
What does everyone else think?
- k
============================================================================
To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".
============================================================================
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list