FW: SC - big spice question

Bonne of Traquair oftraquair at hotmail.com
Mon Apr 19 14:17:33 PDT 1999


>I've seen the occurrence of it takes less spice for the large dish 
than the
>small several times but it has always been when the spices used for 
the
>trial came from my spices in my kitchen and the spices for the feast 
were
>purchased just before the feast. 

I think you have hit the nail on the head here.  Whether for a feast 
or just a big meal at home I'm likely to have bought brand new spices 
if I'm cooking a larger than usual amount.

On the other hand, it seems people are taking "you won't need as much 
as mathmatically indicated" to mean "the mathematically correct amount 
is way too much".  Which isn't what I meant.  I meant that when I've 
made 2x, 3x, 4x batches of recipes, sometimes with spice already on 
hand, sometimes with fresh stuff, I add half to three-quarters of the 
mathmatically correct amount of spice, taste it and it tastes fine.  
The remaining amount of spice wouldn't improve it, so why add it?   
Might as well save the spice.  

Bonne

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
============================================================================

To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".

============================================================================


More information about the Sca-cooks mailing list