SC - Re: Substitution - Response Phlip
CBlackwill@aol.com
CBlackwill at aol.com
Fri Apr 21 22:04:44 PDT 2000
In a message dated 4/21/00 11:14:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time, troy at asan.com
writes:
>
> Thass okay, _not_ substituting for the Guinness would make it
> post-period anyway. I think, though, that what Balthazar meant was that
> he misunderstood the request, thinking it to be for a lamb recipe.
>
> Adamantius
Yep...thought it was all about the lamb. And you're right, the Guinness
would place it, oh..about 100 or so years out of period.
Balthazar of Blackmoor
Such a strange fascination, as I wallow in waste
That such a trivial victory could put a smile on your face.
- Mark Burgess
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list