SC - poached figs in spiced honey syrup
CBlackwill at aol.com
CBlackwill at aol.com
Mon Apr 17 15:39:43 PDT 2000
In a message dated 4/16/00 9:39:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time, LrdRas at aol.com
writes:
>
> Is such a list of substitutions available? More importantly are there any
> manuscripts which give details about exactly how a period cook would have
> substituted and what would have been substituted for what? I am only aware
> of
> specific substitutions detailed in specific recipes.
>
I think it is safe to assume, judging by Zambrini's text, that substitutions
were made "to taste", as it were. I do not have a "documented" substitutions
list, but it seems pretty fair to say that walnuts could be substituted for
almonds if you were not fond of almonds, beef for veal, or duck for chicken.
According to the studies I have undertaken (which are admittedly far less
than some of the old-timers on this list), it seems that the medieval cook
was not as strictly concerned with the actual ingredients of a dish, as he
was with the flavor, consistency, and appearance of the finished product. In
the recipes I have examined, It appears a common practice to sweeten a dish
with "dried fruit" rather than sugar (which was apparently very expensive).
"Dried Fruit" could encompass any number of ingredients, and so, in this
instance at least, the author leaves the choice up to the end user.
Again, as I have said, I am only just beginning to dig deeper into this
mystery of medieval cooking. But the articles I have been able to examine do
seem to indicate more than a little leeway in the preparation or finishing of
a dish. The very term "goode spycery" is indicative of this open-endedness.
Such a strange fascination, as I wallow in waste
That such a trivial victory could put a smile on your face.
- Mark Burgess
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list