SC - New Book: Food and nutrition around 1000

[Karen O]

LrdRas at aol.com wrote:
> 
> The term is usually taken to mean 'court garb' at it's finest or at the very
> least clothing regularly worn by the nobility.

All right, I've figured that out. Taken by whom, and why? Not being a
costumer of much note, I'm just wondering why this is. The only thing I
can think of is that at some point the term might have meant a full
repro from a portrait of Elizabeth I. If it refers only to the time
period it is a misappelation.

Adamantius
- -- 
Phil & Susan Troy

troy at asan.com