SC - ETHICAL DILEMMA
Serian
serian at uswest.net
Wed Jun 14 17:07:29 PDT 2000
At 8:16 AM -0400 6/14/00, Philip & Susan Troy wrote:
(replying to me)
>I didn't see the reply as an attempt to persuade anybody toward an ideal
>approach, which is why I bothered to respond. While I agreed with the
>basic sentiment that we oughtta serve period food, I was concerned with
>the effect of the sentiment expressed in comparatively intimidating (for
>a new person) negative terms. It is against, it violates the intent of
>the SCA, I won't go, neither will my friends.
But Ras wasn't attacking the lady who asked the question, he was
attacking Anne-Marie, who answered it. And she can defend herself,
and is unlikely to be intimidated.
David Friedman
Professor of Law
Santa Clara University
ddfr at best.com
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list