Authenticity, philosophy, and advocacy (was Re: SC - questions)

[KallipygosRed@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/15/00 9:35:03 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
LrdRas at aol.com writes:

> << Someone had come online to ask about running a first feast or some such, 
>  and 
>   was immediately jumped for not using totally period recipes 
>    >>
>  
>  This statement is totally without foundation.
>  
>  Ras

Only because I no longer have the post available. Sorry, otherwise I would 
have included a snippet post of it. I wasn't trying to be argumentative. Just 
trying to make a point about interpretation miscommunications that can happen 
without meaning to do so, especially in written communication. Guess it 
wasn't clear. Never mind.

Lars