SC - You think it's not period??

[david friedman]

At 5:35 PM -0400 6/7/00, Bronwynmgn at aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 6/7/2000 11:09:20 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>TerryD at Health.State.OK.US writes:
>
><< The fact that he blew you off when you asked about the documentation is the
>  most telling point against the credibility of the information.  People who
>  have really found something are usually willing to share their sources and
>  take the bows for the achievement. >>
>
>It wasn't so much that he blew me off as that he obviously felt that the
>documentation he had was sufficient, and that I was being anal by a) wanting
>to see it, and b) not taking it at face value.
>The person in question is not known for authenticity or research skills, but
>he does cook a mighty fine dinner.

I think you should assume, for reasons others have pointed out, that 
his "documentation" is wholly bogus. Very likely he honestly believes 
in it, and very likely he doesn't much care.

David/Cariadoc
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/