SC - Re: sca-cooks V1 #2336

[ashbrooke at excite.com]

Bal,

Why is the burden of proof on those who do not believe the post to be a
joke?  No part of the original work had a jocular tone, the author has no
established reputation as a satirist, and the forum the author chose was not
one dedicated to satire, ASFAIK.  On what basis do you draw the conclusion
that 'The post in question was obviously a joke!!!!'?

Ragnar Ketilsson

>Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 05:20:20 EDT 
>From: CBlackwill at aol.com 
>Subject: Re: SC - Re: Aoife's Complaint 

>In a message dated 6/3/00 2:20:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
stefan at texas.net 
>writes: 

>> But the 'Peerage Cookbook' message was obviously a joke. Enough so that
it 
>>  is now in the Florilegium as: 

>The post in question was obviously a joke!!!!  Come on, people!  Get with
the 
>program...Who on this list can tell me that the original poster of that 
>message actually believed the stuff he was writing???  It was SATIRE!   
>COMEDY!  Chill... 

>Bal 






_______________________________________________________
Get 100% FREE Internet Access powered by Excite
Visit http://freelane.excite.com/freeisp