SC - questions
CBlackwill at aol.com
CBlackwill at aol.com
Tue Jun 13 15:43:09 PDT 2000
In a message dated 6/13/00 5:30:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, troy at asan.com
writes:
> What we seem to tend to do is more like Feast Highlights, Film at 11.
> Not that we couldn't make a better attempt at a real period feast and
> menu structure, but we'd probably have to build an event around it,
> rather than simply providing a fancy meal for people at one of our events.
>
So why not replace the "Breakfast", "Lunch" and "Feast" monickers at events
with "First Remove", "Second Remove", etc...? This way, the populace still
gets thier flirting and rear-smooching time between "courses", and the Feast
Steward still gets to provide a "complete feast".
I've never been a fan of the "dine and dash" method of eating. Particularly
when I have paid good money to go to a "feast". I like a long, leisurley
meal, with plenty of entertainment and good conversation in between courses.
Sure, a break or two for smokes behind the woodshed, or begging your way into
a Pelican is always appreciated, but, particularly if the event is a "feast
event", the meal should take precedence.
Balthazar of Blackmoor
(just my two penne worth)
Mr. Wizard, what happens when you combine pasta and antipasta?
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list