SC - questions
david friedman
ddfr at best.com
Tue Jun 13 15:42:48 PDT 2000
At 6:43 PM -0400 6/13/00, CBlackwill at aol.com wrote:
>So why not replace the "Breakfast", "Lunch" and "Feast" monickers at events
>with "First Remove", "Second Remove", etc...? This way, the populace still
>gets thier flirting and rear-smooching time between "courses", and the Feast
>Steward still gets to provide a "complete feast".
For one thing, "remove" isn't a period term for "course," SCA
tradition to the contrary.
The period references I have seen (I'm thinking of Chiquart and
Rumpolt) imply two substantial means a day, not three. "Fruhmahle"
and "Nachtmahle" in Rumpolt, as I recall.
David/Cariadoc
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list