SC - questions

CBlackwill at aol.com CBlackwill at aol.com
Wed Jun 14 22:54:31 PDT 2000


In a message dated 6/14/00 8:06:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, LrdRas at aol.com 
writes:

> <sigh> To who m? The tiny minority of the SCA. Inc. that composes the 
group? 
>  The few eventers that come their way? 

Why, yes!  Because _that_ is the only group that matters at the moment the 
feast is held.  Those who require more effort simply won't go.  No harm done.

> Would you except such a lax standard 
> in 
>  calligraphy, illumination, costuming, and any o the myriad other areas of 
>  interest in the SCA? This smacks not a little of the 'if they had it they 
>  would have used or done it' mentality. 

Would I accept such a lax standard from myself??  No.  Would I accept it from 
others??  Certainly.  That is their choice, and they are the only one who can 
make it.  I can offer positive encouragement (but only if asked my opinion), 
or I can offer physical assistance.  What I cannot offer is to make the 
choice for them.


Not acceptable in any sense of the 
>  meaning, IMO.

Thank goodness there is a wide variety of opinions, eh?

>  

Balthazar of Blackmoor
Mr. Wizard, what happens when you combine pasta and antipasta?


More information about the Sca-cooks mailing list