SC - questions/kinda long, sorry
Jeff Gedney
JGedney at dictaphone.com
Mon Jun 19 07:23:32 PDT 2000
Lars did post:
> Perhaps this is because when I first got
> involved in the SCA I was in an Arts and Sciences dedicated household; they
> were looking toward prizes and awards for their efforts.
This is a frequent and fundamental cause for problems in the arts and
sciences in the SCA, as far as I am concerned.
Getting awards should never be the goal, only an encouragement to
continue on your path.
The reason you do something should be because you like doing it.
the reason yuou get awards should be because you are doing well
at something you like doing.
let me explain my point with an illustration:
Say there is an annual "prestigious arts contest" in your region.
Take two cases, Lady A and Lady B.
Lady A wants to win that contest more than _anything_.
So Lady A picks Eastern Slobbovian Feather Weaving, because that
category was very sparsely entered in last years contest. She does
this because it increases the odds of winning.
So she hits the library, and finds out all she can about it. but now she
has a dilemma, go with the secondary and tertiary sources she has in
the library, and be able to start her project on time to enter the event,
or to wait to get more information, and enter another year. Of course
she chooses to get right to work, because she is doing this to win.
Now little does she know, but most of her source documents are
very poor, and consist mostly of heresay accounts, and some small
photos of artifacts with very little detail. In her documentation is an
account which is in fact blatently untrue and false.
Lady A completes her work, Photocopies her documentation and
enters it into the Competition.
There are two outcomes.
outcome 1)
No Judge knows anything about Eastern Slobbovia, and she wins
her category and the over all contest.
Now she is the "local Expert" on all things Slobbovian, and she
continues to perpetuate errors in her research, as she passes that
misinformation along to proteges and in workshops.
Outcome 2)
A judge happens to have done some research on Slobbovia, and
spots the holes in her documentation, and she gets fair marks, but
documentation errors cost her any kind of award.
Now she is frustrated, angry and sour over the loss of almost a year
of her life, she drops the entire Slobbovian Project, or drops out of
the SCA altogether in disgust.
Now take the example of Lady B.
Lady B is interested in Eastern Slobbovia becasue of something
she read in another of her researches, so she digs in, and gets all
the information she can. Getting books through the ILL, and visiting
museums to take pictures/sketches of the unique Feather weaving.
It looks fun, so she makes a loom, and starts playing. Two or three
years down the road, as she is making this at an event, someone says
"Hey! B, that's really good, mabe you should enter it in the competition!"
so she does, supplying her researches and references.
There are three outcomes:
outcome 1)
No Judge knows anything about Eastern Slobbovia, and she loses
her category and the over all contest.
Lady B shruggs her shoulders and says, "OK, Next year"
and goes right back to the researches and weaving she enjoys
so much, and Teaching anyone who happens to be interested how to
do it and where to find the correct information
outcome 2)
No Judge knows anything about Eastern Slobbovia, and she wins
her category and the over all contest.
Lady B shruggs her shoulders and says, "OK, thanks"
and goes right back to the researches and weaving she enjoys
so much, and Teaching anyone who happens to be interested how to
do it and where to find the correct information
Outcome 3)
A judge happens to have done some research on Slobbovia, and
checkes her documentation, and she wins the category and the
over all contest.
Lady B shruggs her shoulders and says, "OK, thanks"
and goes right back to the researches and weaving she enjoys
so much, and Teaching anyone who happens to be interested how to
do it and where to find the correct information
the Judge sits down with her, and is astonished to find out how much
she knows in the course of a three hour conversation. The Judge
then reccommends her for Laurel consideration, and she is given the
accolade of Peerage for her work.
Lady B bows her head and says, "OK, thanks"
and goes right back to the researches and weaving she enjoys
so much, and Teaching anyone who happens to be interested how to
do it and where to find the correct information
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list