SC - questions
CBlackwill at aol.com
CBlackwill at aol.com
Wed Jun 14 22:54:31 PDT 2000
In a message dated 6/14/00 8:06:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, LrdRas at aol.com
writes:
> <sigh> To who m? The tiny minority of the SCA. Inc. that composes the
group?
> The few eventers that come their way?
Why, yes! Because _that_ is the only group that matters at the moment the
feast is held. Those who require more effort simply won't go. No harm done.
> Would you except such a lax standard
> in
> calligraphy, illumination, costuming, and any o the myriad other areas of
> interest in the SCA? This smacks not a little of the 'if they had it they
> would have used or done it' mentality.
Would I accept such a lax standard from myself?? No. Would I accept it from
others?? Certainly. That is their choice, and they are the only one who can
make it. I can offer positive encouragement (but only if asked my opinion),
or I can offer physical assistance. What I cannot offer is to make the
choice for them.
Not acceptable in any sense of the
> meaning, IMO.
Thank goodness there is a wide variety of opinions, eh?
>
Balthazar of Blackmoor
Mr. Wizard, what happens when you combine pasta and antipasta?
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list