[Trimaris] Re: SC - Highnesses, Lownesses, and Period Cooking.

[david friedman]

At 10:46 AM -0500 3/1/00, Steve Brooks wrote:

>Observation:  It was admitted that Her Highness' original missive was
>perhaps poorly stated, and that this type of feast was the object of her
>intention all along.

I don't think opinions by people other than Her Highness of what they 
think Her Highness meant are relevant here; do you?

>Observation:  The conflict no longer exists and the matter should,
>therefore, be at an end.  Misunderstanding explained. Apologies for
>unintended offenses offered.

Unless I have missed it, Her Highness has not responded at all, here 
or (more relevantly) in the places where her original statement 
appeared. I don't think we have seen any reason to believe either 
that her intention was "tasty period feasts"-- the clear implication 
of her message was that that was not an option--or that she thinks 
she misspoke.

Note, by the way, that although your message went to both the cooks 
list and the trimaris list, responses such as this one are bounced by 
the trimaris list, presumably because it is set up to only accept 
posts from list members. I don't think anyone has posted here (in the 
cook's list) instructions for temporarily joining the trimaris list 
in order to keep that from happening. So the result is that, at 
present, people on the trimaris list are seeing only one side of the 
conversation.

David/Cariadoc
http://www.best.com/~ddfr/