[Trimaris] Re: SC - Highnesses, Lownesses, and Period Cooking.
david friedman
ddfr at best.com
Wed Mar 1 12:12:01 PST 2000
At 10:46 AM -0500 3/1/00, Steve Brooks wrote:
>Observation: It was admitted that Her Highness' original missive was
>perhaps poorly stated, and that this type of feast was the object of her
>intention all along.
I don't think opinions by people other than Her Highness of what they
think Her Highness meant are relevant here; do you?
>Observation: The conflict no longer exists and the matter should,
>therefore, be at an end. Misunderstanding explained. Apologies for
>unintended offenses offered.
Unless I have missed it, Her Highness has not responded at all, here
or (more relevantly) in the places where her original statement
appeared. I don't think we have seen any reason to believe either
that her intention was "tasty period feasts"-- the clear implication
of her message was that that was not an option--or that she thinks
she misspoke.
Note, by the way, that although your message went to both the cooks
list and the trimaris list, responses such as this one are bounced by
the trimaris list, presumably because it is set up to only accept
posts from list members. I don't think anyone has posted here (in the
cook's list) instructions for temporarily joining the trimaris list
in order to keep that from happening. So the result is that, at
present, people on the trimaris list are seeing only one side of the
conversation.
David/Cariadoc
http://www.best.com/~ddfr/
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list