SC - Bad Feasts--Philosophically Speaking

Decker, Terry D. TerryD at Health.State.OK.US
Thu Oct 26 05:01:27 PDT 2000


The issue was how does one control the cook.  If the autocrat is doesn't
know much about the dynamics of planning, cooking and presenting a feast,
then they had best not get into direct confrontation.

When I bid on a feast, my proposal contains at least a partial menu,
proposed budget, planned maximum seating, planned paid seating, cost per
plate, maximum budget limit and break even.  Just so there is no mistake
about what I'm doing.  Accept the bid, and we have a contract.  Last time I
stuck in two different methods of reservation and payment just so the
"budget committee" would have something to decide.

If an autocrat interferes with me performing my contract, they are invited
to do my job, which is why the line is important in the context of the
original question. 

Bear

> TerryD at Health.State.OK.US writes:
> 
> 
> > Is the autocrat competent to plan and prepare such a feast
> 
> I fail to see the significance of this. If a kitchen steward has been 
> selected, then it is to be assumed they know what they need to know to
> plan 
> and prepare the feast. After the initial selection is accomplished, I see
> no 
> reason for the autocrat to concern themselves with the kitchen in other
> than 
> a cursory manner.....
> 
> Ras
> The test of good manners is to be patient with bad ones.- Solomon Ibn
> Gabirol
> ==========================================================================
> ==
> 
> To be removed from the SCA-Cooks mailing list, please send a message to
> Majordomo at Ansteorra.ORG with the message body of "unsubscribe SCA-Cooks".
> 
> ==========================================================================
> ==
> 


More information about the Sca-cooks mailing list