SC - Re: Wiccan/Pagan Wannabes/Politics
KallipygosRed at aol.com
KallipygosRed at aol.com
Thu Oct 26 09:08:07 PDT 2000
In a message dated 10/25/00 8:19:15 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
vongraph at earthlink.net writes:
> . I have
> noticed one thing as a follower of Odin and the true Gods a very large
> number of the folks who claim these relegious/phylosphicial views are full
> of BS :) It seems that they read one book, listen to one conversation and
> their Pagan,Wiccian etc, , they mostly get together for excuse to run around
>
I believe, that you find this kind of behavior in all persuasions of a belief
in a higher power, whether it be Earth bound, Asgard bound, or Heaven bound.
Religion is a personal matter to most, and to some nothing more than a good
means to an end. I have a son who is Bhudist, I myself am recovering Mormon
with a strong bent toward acquiring statuary of Egyptian Gods. But I think it
is because I like the workmanship, not necessarily because I am a follower. I
was raised to find my own way by my mother, and I have a strong belief that
God exists in all living things, which more or less mirrors my Grandmother's
Native Indian beliefs rather than anything else I've ever seen. However I
believe in the Father **and** the Mother of creation, and I've not yet been
introduced to anything that mirrors that concept as yet. Some people try
religion on like they would try on clothes, which is not a bad thing,
actually. Each of us are different and sometimes we need different fit than
the person next to us. But I have noticed that most people who are
comfortable with their own fit do not need to try to get others to have the
same, and are more tolerant and accepting of others beliefs. I have a very
good friend who is Jewish. She attends lots of events with me, including
Christmas and my son's Temple. One day I asked her if she found it offensive,
and she said, "No. God answers to a lot of names. Although he must have a
devil of time keeping his calendar straight." Now, that is someone at peace
with their place in the cosmos!
So, people who are obviously playing at religion are not really demonstrative
of the belief, I don't think. I do agree that more and more recently we have
seen more of the beliefs considered "offshoots or alien" become acceptable.
Years ago saying you were Asatrue (is that right?) would have gotten you
punched; a Druidic friend of mine was fired from her job because they didn't
like the idea she was witch. Which she wasn't. She didn't even consider
herself Wiccan. Different. That was 1972. In 1999 her niece was hired by same
firm without batting an eye over her wearing pagan emblems, including a
pentogram, or having a bumper sticker that says, "Lifes a witch and then you
fly".
I do notice that in the SCA we have a higher ratio of unusual and different,
non mainstream beliefs, than are acceptable in other areas of work/play. I
wonder if that is because we tend to be an activity that draws professionals
and educated individuals interested in history, so therefore more open to
other avenues of thought and belief, than, say, would be drawn to a rifle
club or hunting club, or swimming club?
I think we as a people have come a long way since the uproar over JFK being
Catholic was such an issue during his presidential campaign. But I think it
will be still a longer time before we would not make an issue of someone
being an offshoot of the mainstream religions in political arena. I can say
this, though, politics is the last place that will be affected. So, when we
see it happen, we will know that whatever the discipline followed, it will
have become mainstream when a political runner claims to be of that belief.
Okay, climbing down now.
Lars
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list