SC - alcohol revisited

[Philip & Susan Troy]

Chris Stanifer wrote:
> 
> --- "Decker, Terry D." <TerryD at Health.State.OK.US>
> wrote:
> > Am I going out of my way to provide a list of the
> > ingredients of my feast?
> > I don't think so.
> 
> The actual question was not really about posting a
> list of ingredients, which I feel is certainly the
> least we could do.  The question was actually a little
> more broad in scope.  At what point can we, as SCA
> cooks, back away from the table and say "I have done
> enough...the rest is up to you."?  Does it end with
> the list of ingredients?  If it does, then I say
> "problem solved".  If, however, we are to be held
> accountable for our neighbors relapse into alcoholism
> because there was a trace amount of port in our
> porridge, then I say "shame on us".  That's how this
> thread (or this version of the thread) got started
> (and tends to get started every time it comes up).
> So, my question is really "at what point is our
> obligation satisfied?"

This is the question I asked quite some time ago, and suggested that
beyond a certain point it is a matter of personal interpretation.

Adamantius
- -- 
Phil & Susan Troy

troy at asan.com