[Sca-cooks] Feastocrate vs. Head Cook
Lord Boroghul Khara
boroghul at narn.pecan-tree.com
Fri Dec 13 09:23:13 PST 2002
The title hasn't really gone away, Vitha, it's more a personal preference
issue.
Tomato-Tomah-to that sort of thing.
There are some people that don't think it is necessary to add "-ocrat" to
everything involving an SCA event ( feastocrat, landocrat, autocrat,
childocrat, etc)
Others just like the sound of the title better. I personally like Head Cook
better, one of my dearest friends prefers feastocrat.
Things may have changed in Ponte Alto now, but while I was active there, the
preferred term was Head Cook.
Neither is really wrong, and when either is said everyone understands that
you're talking about the volunteer* to cooking the feast for the event.
* poor sucker with helium hand syndrome that said "No...problem"
Vitha uge-ber:
> So - I must have missed the converstion...
> Why have we gone away from the title of "Feastocrate"? Not that I ever
> thought it was a fabulous title, But "Head Cook" doesn't seem to fit.
>
> For example: I am the "Head Cook" for the Performer's Symposium in Ponte
Alto
> in Feb, but my Deputy will probably do more cooking than me - I'm the
> organizational queen of the party.
>
> I like the title "Feast Steward" that they use in the Middle. Any
comments?
>
> Vitha
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list