[Sca-cooks] Feastocrate vs. Head Cook

[Nancy Kiel]

How about Principal Cook?



Nancy Kiel
nancy_kiel at hotmail.com
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.   Emerson





>From: "Lord Boroghul Khara" <boroghul at narn.pecan-tree.com>
>Reply-To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
>To: <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
>Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Feastocrate vs. Head Cook
>Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 12:23:13 -0500
>
>The title hasn't really gone away, Vitha, it's more a personal preference
>issue.
>
>Tomato-Tomah-to  that sort of thing.
>
>There are some people that don't think it is necessary to add "-ocrat" to
>everything involving an SCA event ( feastocrat, landocrat, autocrat,
>childocrat, etc)
>Others just like the sound of the title better.  I personally like Head
>Cook
>better, one of my dearest friends prefers feastocrat.
>
>Things may have changed in Ponte Alto now, but while I was active there,
>the
>preferred term was Head Cook.
>
>Neither is really wrong, and when either is said everyone understands that
>you're talking about the volunteer* to cooking the feast for the event.
>
>
>
>* poor sucker with helium hand syndrome that said "No...problem"
>
>Vitha uge-ber:
>
>
> > So - I must have missed the converstion...
> > Why have we gone away from the title of "Feastocrate"?  Not that I ever
> > thought it was a fabulous title, But "Head Cook" doesn't seem to fit.
> >
> > For example:  I am the "Head Cook" for the Performer's Symposium in
>Ponte
>Alto
> > in Feb, but my Deputy will probably do more cooking than me - I'm the
> > organizational queen of the party.
> >
> > I like the title "Feast Steward" that they use in  the Middle.  Any
>comments?
> >
> > Vitha
>
>_______________________________________________
>Sca-cooks mailing list
>Sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
>http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/sca-cooks


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail