[Sca-cooks] Re: Copyright and violation

[Linda Peterson]

We move now towards the realm of morality. By refusing to even let the
book be trascribed, that toad who inherited it, however legal his stance
may be, I consider to be immoral in the extreme. What if the place burns
down? Owners of history have an obligation to protect and disseminate it.

Still incensed by an attitude,
Mirhaxa

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, johnna holloway wrote:
> There are however single  or sole surviving copies of works that are not
> available for transcription. This is the equivalent of owning a painting
> or artwork. These works often carry additional warnings on the microfilm
> for example that they cannot be used in any published form or for
> research without permission being obtained from the owner. In as much as
> the only place to obtain a copy of this work is from that one copy, one
> has to comply or risk penalities.
>
> Johnna Holloway  Johnnae llyn Lewis
>
  mirhaxa at morktorn.com