sjk3 at cornell.edu
Thu Aug 7 08:32:09 PDT 2008
>Johnna Holloway wrote:
>>I mentioned this question to the author of Take A /Thousand Eggs/ or More
>>and Cindy Renfrow wrote me that
>>"Off the top of my head...
>><shrug> Spices were expensive imports. Except for a few notable
>>exceptions in the collection, and as far as I recall, spices were used
>>sparingly and in a manner that they'd be most noticed by the diners
>>i.e. as a final tasty, colorful garnish. This was especially true on
>>white dishes. Herbs, ginger and saffron, OTOH, were grown locally and
>>used in larger quantity.?
>Then how does she explain the sometimes enormous quantities of spices such
>as cinnamon and pepper and nutmegs that show up in some household
>inventories of the period? (I am at work and have no direct references
>handy, I'll try to dig some up later at home if anyone really wants some).
>I can only surmise that these great quantities of spice were not allowed
>to just sit unused until they went bad. I am also convinced that
>conspicuous consumption and showing off one's wealth were just as much in
>fashion then as they are today. People have always operated on the
>principle of "if you have it, flaunt it".
How big a household are we talking about, though? The kind of place that
we have cookbooks from are often feeding a very large number of people, and
would go through spices faster than the average family today.
More information about the Sca-cooks