[Sca-cooks] Sca-cooks Digest, Vol 31, Issue 5
ldyannedubosc at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 2 17:03:18 PST 2008
Hmmm, just because someone else has a good idea first doesn't mean we can't use it. Should we stop having Kings and Queens because they have Kings and Queens?
I don't ehink that is a valid arguement against requiring aspirants to demonstrate that they are well rounded, and not just beauty queens and stick jocks.
"If you ignore the dragon, it will eat you. If you confront the dragon, it will overpower you. If you ride the dragon, you will take advantage of its might and power."
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, sca-cooks-request at lists.ansteorra.org <sca-cooks-request at lists.ansteorra.org> wrote:
> Sca-cooks mailing list
> Sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
>I do think it is nice when there are requirements for Crown that push
>for a more-rounded couple than that one of them is simply good at
>hitting others with a stick.
Now, i actually think it's a good idea. But, uh, mmm, isn't that a
bit like one of the SCA off-shoots? (i forget which one)
Urtatim (that's err-tah-TEEM)
the persona formerly known as Anahita
Sca-cooks mailing list
Sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
More information about the Sca-cooks