[Sca-cooks] Size of Trenchers
Jim and Andi
jimandandi at cox.net
Sun Jul 5 07:10:17 PDT 2009
Something else to consider is the size of the portions. If you're going
to be expected to eat even half of the dishes presented at a normal
feast then the portion sizes are going to be very small. I think 4x6
sounds about right.
From: sca-cooks-bounces+jimandandi=cox.net at lists.ansteorra.org
[mailto:sca-cooks-bounces+jimandandi=cox.net at lists.ansteorra.org] On
Behalf Of Terry Decker
Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 8:50 AM
To: Cooks within the SCA
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Size of Trenchers
Given the use of "finger" as a unit of measure, the "foot" in Menagier's
case may be the "manual foot" which would mean a 6 1/2 inch diameter.
experimentation I've done suggests that a trencher loaf will be between
and 8 inches in diameter and 8 to 12 ounces in weight.
The original trenchers (roughly 11th-12th Century) appear to have been
loaves, which by the 14th Century were being pared into various
shapes and being used in multiples.
To my knowledge, bread trenchers did not come as large as modern plates.
you consider the cost of preparing and using them, bread trenchers were
exercise in conspicuous consumption limited to the wealthy, so the small
size would add to the effect. In addition, the trenchers might be
several times during the meal.
More information about the Sca-cooks