[Sca-cooks] Missing Artes Draconis

Elaine Koogler kiridono at gmail.com
Wed Mar 3 05:27:35 PST 2010


While I won't be at Gulf Wars, I will be at Pennsic...and would love to have
a copy of it.  I am assuming that, in order to avoid any future copyright
issues, it will be reformatted so that it doesn't look like "Cooks'
Illustrated?"

This is unfortunate...and, knowing at least one of the individuals involved,
cannot believe that plagarism, with all that that implies, was intended.  I
believe that it was intended as a tribute to the magazine.  Certainly they
should have contacted the folks at the magazine and asked for their
permission.  But I don't believe for a minute that it was intended as a
"ripoff".  I do know that BoD has chastised the parties involved to a point
that they feel is sufficient.

Kiri

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Jakob Baker <jakobthebrewer at hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> Had to sign on and quit lurking so I could mention the missing Artes
> Draconis Award Winning Cookery issue is alive. Thanks to Estrella and
> friendships made there, a group of us finally managed to obtain a copy of
> the unobtainable banned issue no one is supposed to now see! (We have been
> having great fun exchanging the downloaded .pdf within a group of interested
> people. We have been toying with the idea of printing copies off and making
> them available at events like Gulf Wars so anyone wanting a copy can have
> one. How many copies should we print? If you want one speak up!)
> Ok, we know the official story and the Midrealm Chronicler and the BoD
> would like everyone to think there were just "some 'issues' with that issue
> right now, so it's unavailable for distribution at this time".
> Minor problems and some issues? We've seen the actual issue! What happened
> in this case is the Chronicler, Editor and Special Editor (all the
> responsible in charge people) always intended this special issue to be an
> exact copy (the format, style, essential makeup. fonts and spacing, regular
> columns, etc.) of the excellent and well known Cooks Illustrated magazine!
> Hey, folks, how original or creative is it to exactly copy a respected
> modern culinary magazine, a well known trademarked and copyrighted
> commercial one with a legal team to boot? It was never a mistake either! It
> was always intentional! They set out to copy Cook's Illustrated! Was this
> ever a great idea? Did they ever stop and think 'this might not be a good
> idea?' Did the authors withdraw their articles? Did anyone say no? They
> plowed full steam ahead. They didn't care; they were so proud; they even
> bragged and blogged about their intentions!
> They even admit it in print in the issue.
> They actually state: "This issue is modeled after the modern cooking
> magazine, Cook’s Illustrated." Modeled? Come on, it was a rip-off from the
> start!
> So, they ripped off Cooks Illustrated hook, line, sinker, bait, and fish!
> They put their version of the magazine up free on the web. They promoted the
> rip-off on various lists, Facebook pages, and blogs all over the world.
> Various authors with articles in the issue got on various other lists and
> promoted the work. This wholesale copying was then rewarded by the Society
> with kingdom awards and then last summer the Society bestowed the William
> Blackfox award on the issue and also "commended" it in the category of Best
> Layout and Design "for the best-looking newsletter. Awarded to the
> newsletter and the Chronicler." Plus a mention for "Cover Art! too!
> Wait! They stole all the design elements and they got rewarded three times
> for this rip-off! The Editor, writers, and the Kingdom Chronicler then
> promoted the issue all over again while patting themselves with "big cheers"
> on the back and announcing how great they were! Don't believe us -- just
> Google Artes Draconis Cookery issue and see! It's all there!
> Everything proceeds along until the folks at Cooks Illustrated noticed and
> demanded the SCA take down the issue and make it disappear. (Did they not
> think their ripoff would ever come to the notice of Cooks Illustrated? The
> web can be a small place.)
> Can you say lawyers and litigation and threats? Can you say trademark and
> copyright infringement?
> The solution: Make IT Disappear! Never speak about IT again! Hide what
> happened! Except nothing on the web truly disappears. There were copies out
> there! We found one!
> What happened next is typical SCA!This was an official kingdom approved
> peers and apprentices of the realm project. Did all those
> OL/OP/Baroness/Countess folks who were so happy to claim credit for the
> issue ever own up to why the issue is gone? Not a word! It's a deepest dark
> secret and cannot be mentioned. We can talk about felony child abuse and
> embezzlement tangles, but we can't mention peers being caught ripping off a
> commercial magazine! Why not? Why is this issue being treated like child
> porn?
> Have these chroniclers, editors, associate editors, and authors been
> punished or even shamed? Have they even lost their Blackfox awards? Some
> members have commented privately (hush, hush, in whispers) that had the
> publication been released with an AoA only editor, he or she would have been
> banished immediately with a revoked membership. Such behavior by a non-peer
> would never have been tolerated!
> Why is it the BoD covers up and silences activities like this one and
> doesn't make examples of the people involved? Possible litigation? Nasty
> legal take down notices? Do they mean anything? What would be wrong with
> banishing all of them --- authors, editors, chroniclers included--- for the
> next year or even forever? How many rules and laws did they break? Why was
> wholesale copying ever rewarded?
> Why doesn't the Board say something? Why can't we talk openly about this
> matter? Why isn't this being used as an example as what not to do?
> So ask yourselves when your dues once again increase to pay for more
> expensive insurance and more legal help, why the Society continues to
> tolerate such activities and stupid errors?  Who put the entire Society in
> jeopardy? Ask yourselves why are these people still members in good
> standing? Hush, hush, we can't talk about it or tell anyone these peers
> screwed up! Hush, hush, indeed!
> Excuse me, again what were they thinking? Why aren't they at least
> embarrassed? Where are the apologies?
> Jakob (returning to lurking mode) Baker and Brewer
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Sca-cooks mailing list
> Sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/sca-cooks-ansteorra.org
>



-- 
"It is only with the heart that one can see clearly; what is essential is
invisible to the eye."
--Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince



More information about the Sca-cooks mailing list