[Sca-cooks] List Statistics for Feb 1, 2011 - Feb 28, 2011

Mon Mar 7 10:35:01 PST 2011

-- 
List Statistics for Feb 1, 2011 - Feb 28, 2011

492 messages processed
	2% marked "OT" (13)
	4% marked "OOP" (21)

-=-=-=- top ten subjects by number of posts -=-=-=-

1. odd (28 posts - 5%)
2. Mattioli's Mushrooms (21 posts - 4%)
3. Documenting balsamic? Slow progress (18 posts - 3%)
4. udder things to consider (16 posts - 3%)
5. Not Dead Yet (13 posts - 2%)
6. My upcoming feast... (10 posts - 2%)
7. Fw: [Summits] Fw: Officially Period...the tomato (10 posts - 2%)
8. suet Vs. fat (10 posts - 2%)
9. Right Noble Guild (10 posts - 2%)
10. Period copyright (9 posts - 1%)

-=-=-=- cookbooks most often referred to -=-=-=-

1. Ein New Kochbuch [Germany, 1581] (26)
2. Ouverture de Cuisine [France, 1604] (7)
3. Das Kuchbuch der Sabina Welserin [Germany, 1553] (4)
4. Koge Bog [Denmark, 1616] (3)
5. The good Huswifes Handmaide for the Kitchin [England, 1594] (1)
6. Forme of Cury [England, 1390] (1)
7. Libro di cucina / Libro per cuoco [Italy, ca. 1400] (1)
8. Das Kochbuch des Meisters Eberhard [Germany, ca. 1400] (1)
9. The English Housewife [England, 1615] (1)

-=-=-=- ten most commonly used words with more than 6 letters-=-=-=-

1. recipes (used 100 times)
2. recipe (used 96 times)
3. period (used 86 times)
4. vinegar (used 81 times)
5. little (used 80 times)
6. people (used 63 times)
7. german (used 61 times)
8. pepper (used 59 times)
9. balsamic (used 51 times)
10. cooking (used 47 times)

-=-=-=- ten least commonly used words with more than 6 letters-=-=-=-

1. kingship (used 1 times)
2. pickles (used 1 times)
3. interpetation (used 1 times)
4. blacktailed (used 1 times)
5. supplied (used 1 times)
6. affluent (used 1 times)
7. colorado (used 1 times)
8. honourable (used 1 times)
9. gestehen (used 1 times)
10. potentially (used 1 times)

-=-=-=- ten longest words used in a post -=-=-=-

1. culinaryexhibition (Johnna Holloway)
2. telecommunicatins (Huette von Ahrens)
3. acetaiadigiorgio (Johnna Holloway)
4. entrepreneurship (emilio szabo)
5. tabernaemontanus (Susanne Mayer)
6. experimentation (Terry Decker)
7. unceremoniously (Karen Lyons-McGann)
8. recommendations (Stefan li Rous)
9. historiographer (Terry Decker)
10. lautensternchen (V O)

-=-=-=- top ten posters by number of posts -=-=-=-

1. Johnna Holloway (57 posts - 11%)
2. wheezul at canby.com (30 posts - 6%)
3. Terry Decker (27 posts - 5%)
4. Sharon Palmer (25 posts - 5%)
5. Stefan li Rous (25 posts - 5%)
6. V O (16 posts - 3%)
7. lilinah at earthlink.net (15 posts - 3%)
8. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ana_Vald=E9s?= (15 posts - 3%)
9. yaini0625 at yahoo.com (14 posts - 2%)
10. Raphaella DiContini (11 posts - 2%)

-=-=-=- top ten posters by message size -=-=-=-

1. Johnna Holloway (score: 39319)
2. wheezul at canby.com (score: 26431)
3. Stefan li Rous (score: 20094)
4. Terry Decker (score: 18193)
5. lilinah at earthlink.net (score: 17226)
6. Sharon Palmer (score: 16381)
7. V O (score: 15460)
8. Raphaella DiContini (score: 14648)
9. Louise Smithson (score: 10152)
10. Elaine Koogler (score: 8555)

-=-=-=- top ten posters by message size (non-quote) -=-=-=-

1. Johnna Holloway (score: 21869)
2. Stefan li Rous (score: 14382)
3. lilinah at earthlink.net (score: 13414)
4. wheezul at canby.com (score: 13278)
5. Sharon Palmer (score: 13090)
6. V O (score: 10477)
7. Louise Smithson (score: 9118)
8. Raphaella DiContini (score: 6186)
9. emilio szabo (score: 5664)
10. Terry Decker (score: 4565)

-=-=-=- Top Scoring Posters -=-=-=-

1. Johnna Holloway (50)
2. wheezul at canby.com (45)
3. Stefan li Rous (43)
4. Sharon Palmer (38)
5. lilinah at earthlink.net (38)
6. Terry Decker (36)
7. V O (34)
8. Raphaella DiContini (27)
9. Louise Smithson (26)
10. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ana_Vald=E9s?= (23)

-=-=-=- Most Powerful Poster -=-=-=-

1. Michael Gunter, Evil List Administrator

-=-=-=- End of List Statistics -=-=-=-

These statistics were generated using the "Autostat" script.

To make sure your list postings are processed correctly, please have
your signature start with "-- " (DASH DASH SPACE NEWLINE)

About These statistics
----------------------

"top ten subjects by number of posts"
This is based on the total number of posts for a given subject line. 
All tags such as "Re:" and "[Sca-cooks]" are automatically stripped from
the subject line so they can be properly tallied.

"cookbooks most often referred to"
This is a simple count of the occurence of a given text.  The search is
case insensitive (capitalization does not matter).  Spelling however
does count.  The texts being checked for are as follows:

     "Harpestreng"
     "Koge Bog"
     "Forme of Cury"
     "Liber cure cocorum"
     "Two Fifteenth-Century"
     "Book of Nurture"
     "Good Housewife's Jewell"
     "Good Huswifes Handmaide"
     "Delights for Ladies"
     "NEVV BOOKE of Cookerie"
     "Proper newe Booke of Cokerye"
     "English Housewife"
     "Enseignements"
     "Viandier"
     "Vivendier"
     "Menagier"
     "Du fait"
     "Ouverture"
     "von guter Speise"
     "Eberhard"
     "Inntalkochbuch"
     "Rumpolt"
     "Welserin"
     "Liber de coquina"
     "Libro di cucina"
     "Wel ende edelike spijse"
     "Libre del Coch"

"top ten posters by number of posts"
A simple count of the number of messages sent from each email address. 
If a list member posts using more than one email address, each address
will be counted separately.

"top ten posters by message size"
Content here is the total number of letters for all the email messages
sent from an email address, ignoring text marked as quotes or as a
signature.

This script attempts to account for the most common ways email programs
mark text as being a comment or signature, but does not and can not
manage to catch them all.

"top ten posters by message size (non-quote)"
The quote ratio is the same as the sizecalculation above, but
subtracting the number letters in any quoted lines of text.  This means
that a poster who quotes lots of text and gives short answers may have a
negative score.

"Top Scoring Posters"
The score is calculated by adding the rank of individuals in the "top
ten" lists above (with 1 = 10, 2 = 9, etc...), adding 1 for each
appearance on the "longest words" list.  An extra 19 points is added to
the final number in order to prevent negative values from showing up on
the list (i.e. "swag").

-=-=-=- End of Autostat Output -=-=-=-