No subject

> I understand it quite well. I will see about getting swbell to give me
> authority for our address space to prevent this in the future. I don't
> know how quickly this will happen though.
>
> As an FYI, efn.org is the first site I've found that blocked us. Btw, if
> that is the case, Lainie may not get this message since pug.net is doing
> the same thing.

I also took the liberty of forwarding his message to Lainie, just in
case she didn't get her copy, as Pug comments on above.

Stefan

> Kinda no one's fault- I maded more noise and more noise and someone
> finally talked to the sysadmin at EFN, and this is what they tell me
> this morning:
>
> > Ansteorra.org's mailserver, mail.ansteorra.org, has the IP address
> > 216.62.214.29, which has a reverse-DNS name that resolves somewhere
> > in dsl.austtx.swbell.net (that is, one gets different answers if one
> > looks it up by name to get the address, or by address to get the name).
> > This forward- and reverse-DNS inconsistency can create problems, it
> > would be for the best if they could get swbell.net to delegate
> authoritative
> > reverse DNS to them.
<snip>
--
THLord Stefan li Rous    Barony of Bryn Gwlad    Kingdom of Ansteorra
   Mark S. Harris            Austin, Texas          stefan at texas.net
**** See Stefan's Florilegium files at:  http://www.florilegium.org ****