SR - Principality Discussion (Long)
Zimmermann, Leonard
zimmerml at kci1.com
Wed Jun 3 06:05:38 PDT 1998
Donal wrote:
[Mention of not discussing issue on the net written by me
deleted]----------
[metion of
>I have heard/read this bandied about by a couple of folks who
were
>formerly very active on this list concerning the Principality
issue.
>Let me, at the risk of using up too much space, quote the only
post I
>saw about it:
>On 4/15/98, 1:05 AM, Kingdom Seneschal wrote:
[deleted for brevity]
>So where does he ask folks to stop discussing Principality on
the Net?
>Nowhere. I spoke with Sir Burke shortly after this post was
made, and
>got a clarification - he regarded Net-only discussion
approximately as
>binding as the same discussion held around a campfire at an
event. In
>further posts on this thread, from Mistress Meadhbh, Sir
Lyonel, Pug,
>and Sir Pendaran, no one stated that Net discussion should
cease -
>only that RT information dissemination should be given higher
>priority. (Sir Lyonel mistook Meadhbh's opposition to a meeting
after
>Kingdom Dance to refer to Net discussion. This was corrected in
a
>later post.) If anyone has any posts that I missed, feel free
to send
>them - but I really think that the Principality discussion on
this
>forum died of natural causes.
Actually I wrote that we had lost discussion because people WERE
mentioning it. The important point here is the the folks mentioning this
were/are NOT on the net. So you won't find any posts by them. because
they mentioned them in person to many of us.
Honos Servio,
Lionardo
============================================================================
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Southern
mailing list