SR - Principality law question

[Brent & Susan Rachel]

Drachenwald used Tanist and Tanista.  It was ok, but a bit odd sounding amidst
all the other English titles.

Just my humble opinion, but whatever we call the heirs, I'd sure like to avoid
all this royal family rigamarole where an heir is considered to "decend" from
the current sovereign.., despite any genetic, geographic, or temporal
inconsistencies.

Maybe we could call the heir the "Leon" (french accent please!!!)  Or...., maybe
not. ;-)

Kazimir Petrovich

Timothy A. McDaniel wrote:

> The fancier period idea is to give 'em a landed title -- Earl of
> March, Duke of Cornwall, Prince of Wales, Dauphin, King of the Romans,
> Prince of Asturias, Duke of Rothesay maybe?, whatever.  There's a
> little problem with that in the SCA, tho.  However, if a southern
> barony wanted to wickedly depose their baron and baroness, say, and
> make themselves available to get a new one every 6 months, it'd be a
> lovely period notion.  Their baron/ess would be rather busy with other
> things, so maybe they could get away with more stuff.  No more debates
> about the succession.  Hmmm, some advantages indeed!



============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.