SR - ballots results

[gptaylor]

Our Seneschal and Landeds were in transition.  Was a one or two-populace meeting
time frame allowed?

This is even less of a good way to get everyone behind naming the region.  Four
out of how many groups gave input?   Last time, strange things seemed to go on
with numbers.  This time, no input from half of the SR groups.

This leaves a very bad taste in my mouth.  Decisions to strictly follow a
timeframe when inadequate results were in, and responses throwing deadlines in
the faces of group members who didn't give input for reasons beyond their
control, are going to really dampen any support that was once present for
getting this region named.

Isobel


"Timothy A. McDaniel" wrote:

> gptaylor wrote:
> > Uh....
> > I see something missing.
> > My whole Barony's input!
> > Isobel
>
> Amanda Lewanski <editor at texas.net> wrote:
> > Yeah, what happened to Bjornsborg?
>
> Sosha says that when she mailed the second set of ballots, she also
> mailed a cover letter with the deadline on it, along with a stamped
> envelope addressed to her.  Therefore, I think it's a question to ask
> the seneschal of Bjornsborg.
>
> Daniel de Lincolia
> --
>                     *** NEW PERSONAL ADDRESS ***
> Tim McDaniel is tmcd at jump.net; if that fail,
>     tmcd at austin.ibm.com and tmcd at us.ibm.com are my work accounts.
>     tmcd at crl.com is old and will go away.
> ============================================================================
> Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.

============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.