Period Heraldric Styles...
Nan Bradford-Reid
n.b-reid at MAIL.UTEXAS.EDU
Thu Aug 17 13:21:49 PDT 1995
>Is proper considered to be during the time period associated with the SCA
>or just a term to try and get rid of the word period? Lots of things are
>proper, such as using ratan and duct tape for fighting, but it's not
>period.
>
Neither. It refers to the rules which govern heraldry. Savian makes a
very valid point, essentially, "fly what you want, but don't call it
heraldry [unless it conforms to the heraldic rules]." The rules of
heraldry do not apply only to devices prior to 1600, they apply even today.
If you were an Englishman and wanted a "coat of arms" (another incorrect
usage) you would apply to the King of Arms and they would design a device
for you and you could either accept it or reject it. If you accept it,
they register it and that device is *yours*, not our family's or your son's
(until you die and he petitions for it). I agree with Savian, if one
doesn't want real heraldry, why be concerned with what the heralds think,
anyhoo?
Catherine
More information about the Ansteorra
mailing list