Titles
Chris Walden
cmwalden at bga.com
Thu Jan 11 12:24:33 PST 1996
> From: "Pug" <pug at arlut.utexas.edu>
> Yes, but knowing someone is a Laurel means more than calling them
> Master/Mistress, IMO. The honorific is more of a form of personal
> glorification.
You seem to assume, P.U.G., that the title does nothing but give warm
fuzzies to the people who hold them. I wonder if formality could
have a positive effect on the people who see and hear it and on the Society
as a whole.
Antonio
More information about the Ansteorra
mailing list