michael_gunter1 at msmail.fnts.com
Tue Oct 8 15:19:20 PDT 1996
Kateryn Heathrydge wrote:
> 1st, The period turnaments *I* have heard of, none gets it down to one
> person (though I hear the knights just *love* Pas d' Armes - fight and
> fight and fight....). I guess we could have a war to determine the
> victor, it certainly would be an interesting change. If I am wrong about
> the tourny thing, I am sure someone will say so, and I invite them to.
According to most of the (admittedly limited) research that I've done,
you are mostly correct - there would usually be several "winners" or
"champions" for a given tournament. Thus, by insisting on a single
winner, aren't we imposing a 20th century "ideal" in a (theoretically)
medieval re-creation? Wouldn't having multiple winners give a better
feeling for what a medieval tournament was like?
Michael A. Chance St. Louis, Missouri, USA "At play in the fields
Work: mc307a at sw1stc.sbc.com of St. Vidicon"
Play: mchance at crl.com
More information about the Ansteorra