email correspondence

[stddly at SHSU.edu]

From:	MX%"ansteorra at eden.com" 19-SEP-1996 16:52:41.16
To:	MX%"ansteorra at eden.com"
CC:	
Subj:	Re: email correspondence
 
/On 19 Sep 96 , BSilveraxe at aol.com wrote about Re: principalities:
/
/
/> 
/> The decision was handed down, I believe, by the BOD on what is and
/> is not official correspondence.
/> 
/> Barn
/> 
/
/That would certainly explain it.
/
/The question then would change to why the BOD would say such a thing. 
/Email is a common business practice these days. 
/
/Larkin
/===

Above what Elis writes about it being a past ruling, I think it might not
be a bad thing that it is not considered official correspondance. I have
seen many missives that were extemely reactionary that have been sent on
the net (including my own at times) that if thought out would have been
more constructive. People still have a tendancy to think of themselves
as distanced from what they write and send on the net (though this is
changing).

Lorraine