principalities....a few new thoughts

[dennis grace]

>Hale fellow followers of the Sable Star!
>
>I've written about the increased number of events the Crown would have to 
>attend, also about a solution to the travel problem by implementing a Rotating
>Group Schedule, and about Loyality to the Kingdom remaining intact rather than
>splitting one's loyality between principality and Ansteorra.
>
>Here's a new thought.
>
>Look at the other Kingdoms that have Principalities. There is a _separate_
>geographical location for each of those Kingdoms. The proposal here is to
>have 3 principalities with the Kingdom "overlaid" on top of them. I do not
>believe that this is possible under current Corpora/By-laws. The problem, as I
>see it, is that there is no place left for the Kingdom to exist in. Each
>Kingdom must have a certain number of members to exist. If the area now 
>occupied by Ansteorra is split into three principalities with no physical
>area to be defined as "Kingdom" then Ansteorra has ceased to exist. (The same
>is true of Baronies and Cantons...) There is no current structure to discern
>between "Kingdom members" and "principality members" if the two "spaces" 
>occupy the same location and zip codes. 'Tis a paradox methinks...
>
>Food for thought...
>
>ONE STAR...ONE KINGDOM!
>
>Sir Kief av Kiersted...
>
>
>"Better the Hammer than the nail..."


As I said before, you geys are just silly.  A principality is part of a
kingdom, just as a barony is bart of a kingdom.  Do you really believe that
while you are inside a barony that you are not simultaneously in the kingdom
which holds it?  You must have been joking.

Aquilanne