ANST - Re: Gulf Wars update

[Michael Tucker]

Well said, Petruccio. I have communicated with our Crown about this, and am in
discussion on a local level with the (dis)affected parties, of which I am one. I
would enjoy helping toast the butt of the responsible party, if it could be
narrowed to one or two people, and if it clearly was their choice to treat us so
unchivalrously and not something beyond any reasonable person's control.

In the meantime, I applaud your choice to give the stewards the benefit of the
doubt until we know more clearly why and how this happened.

Yours,
Michael Silverhands, Baron of Stargate


"Patrick J. Cuccurello" wrote:
> I realize arbitrary is Period, but geeze.   I could very well be that the
> autocrats were placed in this awkward position well after their ability to
> deal with it.  From past experience, most Autocrats of very large events
> are neither arbitrary or toadyish.  My guess is that a decision came down
> that they had to make the best of, knowing they were going to have to wear
> their helmets on their hindquarters before it was over.
> 
> Try not to judge them too harshly, their job is difficult enough.  Now, if
> you can trace back to where the decision was originally made, that is
> definitely a party waiting to happen  :)
> 
> In many ways it's a pity to see it happen.  However, with the popularity of
> the War growing, everyone should have seen it coming.  Too bad a system
> wasn't in place before it bit us in the butts (as they say--hindsight is
> 20/20).
> 
> Petruccio
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.