ANST - Tied to the pole- feet to the flame

[Fopdejour1 at aol.com]

In a message dated 5/21/99 11:04:07 PM !!!First Boot!!!, Baronman at aol.com 
writes:

<< Couldn't some type of evaluation or criteria be assessed in 
 order to maintain good standing as a peer?  For example- Knights must win 
one 
 compition in a three year period, Laurels must win an A&S compition every so 
 often and Pelicans could autocrat an event or do a major service every once 
 and awhile.  >>
 

What happens if they don't....or more importantly can't?  Do you yank their 
peerages?  Many of the older peers that cannot meet "the rising bar" are the 
ones that laid the foundation that today's and tomorrow's peers are building 
on.  I don't think they are to be insulted by being made to prove they are 
worthy, but rather honored for the work they put into "creating" the peerage 
orders that have grown from their acomplishments.

This is just the opinion of an idealistic youth,

Charles de Bourbon
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.