ANST - Tied to the pole- feet to the flame
Fopdejour1 at aol.com
Fopdejour1 at aol.com
Fri May 21 17:10:06 PDT 1999
In a message dated 5/21/99 11:04:07 PM !!!First Boot!!!, Baronman at aol.com
writes:
<< Couldn't some type of evaluation or criteria be assessed in
order to maintain good standing as a peer? For example- Knights must win
one
compition in a three year period, Laurels must win an A&S compition every so
often and Pelicans could autocrat an event or do a major service every once
and awhile. >>
What happens if they don't....or more importantly can't? Do you yank their
peerages? Many of the older peers that cannot meet "the rising bar" are the
ones that laid the foundation that today's and tomorrow's peers are building
on. I don't think they are to be insulted by being made to prove they are
worthy, but rather honored for the work they put into "creating" the peerage
orders that have grown from their acomplishments.
This is just the opinion of an idealistic youth,
Charles de Bourbon
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Ansteorra
mailing list