[Ansteorra] A thought about why people leave for feast... oth er than the ...

[Rob rose]

[ Converted text/html to text/plain ]

so then, what i am getting from this is that if i pay feast, but my lady does
not, we shouldn't be allowed to eat together?  Or at least, she shouldn't be
allowed to eat with the rest of the people?  This is how i am taking it.
Please tell me that I am wrong.

Ian Macleod
>From: "Harris Mark.S-rsve60"
>Reply-To: ansteorra at ansteorra.org
>To: "'ansteorra at ansteorra.org'"
>Subject: RE: [Ansteorra] A thought about why people leave for feast... oth er
than the ...
>Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 12:16:35 -0700
>
>Lady Susannah Blackthorne said:
> > Forgive me, but I don't understand. In MiddleKingdom, when I
> > was exiled
> > there, we always had Above the board and below the board
> > seating at a feast.
> > They were shown the same hospitality as those paying feast,
> > and we served
> > them drinks. I fail to understand where the hospitality went.
>
>But those "Above board" and "Below board" seatings were not
>mixed together, correct? So you couldn't sit with your
>friends if some had paid for feast and you hadn't.
>
>The drinks are a nice touch and something that can be paid
>for out of the gate fees rather than the feast fees.
>
>Why is the Ansteorran tradition of allowing paid and
>non-paying feasters to eat together, even though it
>is a major inconvenience to the headcook and servers,
>less hospitalble?
>
>Or are you talking about some inhospitality that has little
>connection to whether the non-paying feasters can dine in
>the same hall as the ones who paid for the feast?
>
>Stefan li Rous
>stefan at texas.net
>_______________________________________________
>Ansteorra mailing list
>Ansteorra at ansteorra.org
>http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/ansteorra

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: Click Here[1]

===References:===
  1. http://g.msn.com/1HM105401/46