[Ansteorra] Provinces, a clarification

Paul DeLisle ferret at hot.rr.com
Mon Jan 23 19:48:20 PST 2006


Umm..my intent was *not* to play games with terms, or definitions; but to
discuss *concepts*.
Do you have a valid point to present?

Alden

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ansteorra-bounces+ferret=hot.rr.com at ansteorra.org
> [mailto:ansteorra-bounces+ferret=hot.rr.com at ansteorra.org]On Behalf Of
> Jennifer Smith
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:35 PM
> To: 'Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.'
> Subject: RE: [Ansteorra] Provinces, a clarification
>
>
> Alden wrote:
> >[...]
> > My new concern is that (from what others have stated) that they were
> > *eminently* capable of being a Barony, yet they *deliberately* chose a
> > modern, egalitarian model; instead of a Medieval (or even
> > Rennaissance) one.
> >[...]
>
> Not necessarily! The history of urban town governments is a
> fascinating one,
> even if you limit it just to England (which, being in the SCA, we should
> not). The SCA term "province" is perhaps not the best term to
> use, but isn't
> that also very typical of the SCA, where Knights outrank Lords?
>
> -Emma de Fetherstan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/ansteorra
>





More information about the Ansteorra mailing list