[Ansteorra] Sad Kingdom Law Change

Greg Coffman baroniago at earthlink.net
Sat Feb 14 08:14:58 PST 2009


On Feb 14, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Mistress Xene wrote:

> <The first is to comply with the change at the Society level to remove
> reference to the office of Waterbearer. >
>
> This poses some interesting questions:
No, it really doesn't.
>
> 1) Can children now go onto the list field to serve water to  
> fighters? After
> all, no authorizations are required any more.
No, they can't.  Nothing has changed in this area.
>
> 2) Can interested parties now form their own Guild of Waterbearers  
> (or the H
> Duo/ Water Mafia / Ice Pirates)?
They could have before.
>
> 3) If no volunteers are working to supply, disinfect, and maintain  
> the water
> supply and equipment for the fighters-at-large, then is everyone  
> solely
> responsible for recruiting their own personal waterbearers?
If people are suddenly going to get pissy and quit carrying water  
around because they suddenly have no office, then yes.
>
> 4) Can this now fall under the pervue of the Chirurgeonate?
>
> 5) Or is this a precursor to the Society-wide demise of the  
> Chirurgeonate,
> as well?
While I know and like a number of chiurgeons, the ones like those who  
didn't want my friend the RN tend to me when my knee went, (or my  
other friend the MD) need to go.
>
> 5) Will it be up to the Knight Marshall or the Autocrat at each  
> event to
> coordinate the volunteers and materials?
Just like before, it'll be up to the event steward.
>
> 6) Can each group still own waterbearing equipment and provide  
> supplies at
> events?
Yes, just like they can own their own pots and pans and provide a  
meal at feast.

> And lastly...
>
> 7) Are YOU willing to drink from an unknown water supply, that may  
> or may
> not be properly disinfected or cared for?
How has this changed?  Does taking away their office suddenly make  
someone sloppy? I think not. She'll still be just as careful, and  
just as hard working.
>
>
> If no one is in charge, then no one is responsible or liable.  
> Especially the
> SCA, Inc.
That would be the point. The SCA can get sued when one of it's  
officers screws up.

Iago
Who thinks water bearers are awesome, office or no.


More information about the Ansteorra mailing list