[Ansteorra] Children in the SCA

[Paul DeLisle]

Honestly, Rose?...It seems that yours does, as well. 
Or, perhaps...it's the fact that you are so quick to *unhesitatingly* and
thoroughly blame an organization whose primary responsibility is *NOT*
Children, or the care of them; when something bad happens.
Because of course...we are an *organization*...and *that* makes us
infallible (to the Legal system...and to those looking for a quick
buck...including the lawyers.)
It's (to my mind) simply another example of Modern society's "I am a Victim"
attitude...."*someone* else must be at fault besides *me*."
As you might be able to tell...I don't ascribe to that attitude.

Be Well.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org [mailto:ansteorra-
> bounces at lists.ansteorra.org] On Behalf Of Rose
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 7:06 PM
> To: Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.
> Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Children in the SCA
> 
> I appreciate your concern, Alden, although I don't think it's a valid
problem,
> and that the solution to what you see as a problem has already happened.
> (Also, Heinlein's quote applies only to attorneys that work for people who
> can afford to bankroll frivolous lawsuits. Attorneys don't swallow camels
on a
> contingency fee.)However, I was curious as to Hosey's opinion and proposed
> solution, primarily because his goalpost seems to be moving. :)
> 
> 
> 
> -R the O
> 
> 
> *               *               *               *          
*               *               *               *               *
>    *               *               *               *
> 
> Ars longa, vita brevis, occasio praeceps, experimentum periculosum,
iudicium
> difficile. ~Hippocrates
> 
> 
> 
> >________________________________
> > From: Paul DeLisle <ferretpd at gmail.com>
> >To: "'Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.'"
> ><ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 6:52 PM
> >Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Children in the SCA
> >
> >In the ensuing *years* of testimony, it is *proven* (by witnesses, and
> >his own confused testimony) that UpnComin' *must* have seen these
> >two...and yet did nothing.
> >WOW! The SCA *MUST* be Liable for a GAZILLION DOLLARS in damages.
> >
> >What I *AM* saying is that our Legal team (whoever they are) needs to
> >set
> >*SOMETHING* in motion to delineate that we are *NOT* a Children's
> >Organization....we are a child-FRIENDLY Organization (and that
> >distinction
> >*MUST* be Legally made....somehow.)
> >
> >Alden
> >(...sadly remembering why I stopped going to events.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ansteorra-bounces at lists.ansteorra.org [mailto:ansteorra-
> >> bounces at lists.ansteorra.org] On Behalf Of Rose
> >> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 4:51 PM
> >> To: Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.; chris st. john
> >> Subject: Re: [Ansteorra] Children in the SCA
> >>
> >> Originally, I thought you were upset about changes that you thought
> >> were going to happen in the future, but then we pointed out that
> >> those changes had already taken place. Then, it seemed like you were
> >> upset because you thought it meant you'd have to take an active role
> >> in protecting our
> >youth,
> >> but then we explained that only those who chose to work with children
> >> would be expected to do so. Now it seems like you're upset that
> >> children come to events at all? Surely, I'm mistaken. What, exactly,
> >> is your
> >complaint?
> >> Also, your proposed solution?
> >>
> >>
> >> -Rose the Obnoxious
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Ansteorra mailing list
> Ansteorra at lists.ansteorra.org
> In order to make changes and manage your account please go to:
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ansteorra-ansteorra.org