[Ansteorra-rapier] Pros and Cons of change

[Crandall]

Cons:
o   The blades are allowed by Society and have not been proven to be unsafe
so we need to allow them.
<cut>
·         Pros:
<cut>
o   Light blades break more frequently than heavy blades elevating the risk
due to lax enforcement.

Does this Con and Pro effectively cancel out each other?



·         Pros:

o   The enforcement of the regulations around the lighter blades is lax at
best creating a risk point.
§  Combatants being authorized without having shown to be safe.
§  Marshals being authorized without knowing how to inspect the equipment.
o   Light blades break more frequently than heavy blades elevating the risk
due to lax enforcement.

Aren't these marshalate issues rather than blade issues?
You use enforcement on two different points.
If a fighter is unsafe, then they would not be authorized in the first
place.

Crandall, Vestigial Marshal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ansteorra.org/pipermail/ansteorra-rapier-ansteorra.org/attachments/20121015/ac2a72af/attachment-0003.htm>