[Bards] Question on performance judging forms

[John Hirling]

Her Grace raises an excellent point.  I wonder if the problem resides more
with the Static forms.  As I recall the discussion the last time the static
forms were revised (I was part of those discussions) documentation was
considered to be so integral to a static entry that no separate catagory was
necessary.  The Gulf Wars Static forms are more specific -- each category
has as part of the heading "as supported by documentation" in italics .   A
worthy subject (among others) for the Round Table at King's College?
--ihon


On 5/8/06, willowjonbardc at juno.com <willowjonbardc at juno.com> wrote:
>
> Dear fellow bards
> As a Laurel I am having problems with the kingdom forms. The Static Arts
> juding forms do not have a separate documentation section. The documentation
> falls into the Authentic section. It is support for your piece. I feel it is
> unfair to add that extra stress to performing artist when it isn't added to
> static arts. I feel the authentic section is enough and we should drop the
> extra documentation section.
> Mistress Willow de Wisp
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month!
> Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage.
> Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bards mailing list
> Bards at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/bards
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ansteorra.org/pipermail/bards-ansteorra.org/attachments/20060509/4b8d4a74/attachment-0001.htm>