[Bards] Question on performance judging forms

[gail young]

Yes, let's do that.
  gwyneth

John Hirling <jhirling at gmail.com> wrote:
  Her Grace raises an excellent point.  I wonder if the problem resides more with the Static forms.  As I recall the discussion the last time the static forms were revised (I was part of those discussions) documentation was considered to be so integral to a static entry that no separate catagory was necessary.  The Gulf Wars Static forms are more specific -- each category has as part of the heading "as supported by documentation" in italics .   A worthy subject (among others) for the Round Table at King's College?
--ihon
 

  On 5/8/06, willowjonbardc at juno.com <willowjonbardc at juno.com > wrote:  Dear fellow bards
As a Laurel I am having problems with the kingdom forms. The Static Arts juding forms do not have a separate documentation section. The documentation falls into the Authentic section. It is support for your piece. I feel it is unfair to add that extra stress to performing artist when it isn't added to static arts. I feel the authentic section is enough and we should drop the extra documentation section.
Mistress Willow de Wisp


________________________________________________________________________
Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month! 
Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage.
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!



_______________________________________________
Bards mailing list 
Bards at ansteorra.org
http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/bards


_______________________________________________
Bards mailing list
Bards at ansteorra.org
http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/bards


		
---------------------------------
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls.  Great rates starting at 1¢/min.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ansteorra.org/pipermail/bards-ansteorra.org/attachments/20060509/952596f5/attachment-0002.htm>