[Bards] Question on performance judging forms

gail young gwynethb63 at yahoo.com
Wed May 10 10:18:54 PDT 2006


That's great if all the judges are "moved" by the same piece.
  Also, how do you give feedback to the others?  You need to do more "moving" pieces?
  

Melody Soice <melodysoice at hotmail.com> wrote:
  I've got to admit that every time I hear about standardized judging forms I 
keep hoping that they come with the option to disregard them altogether and 
just go with the performer that is the most moving or inspiring.

Melody


>From: "Jay Rudin" 
>Reply-To: Ansteorran Bardic list 
>To: "Ansteorran Bardic list" 
>Subject: Re: [Bards] Question on performance judging forms
>Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 10:46:42 -0500
>
>Let's do it. I have no particular hore in this race, because I disapprove 
>of all judging forms, but if people have specific issues with a form, we 
>should try to fix it.
>
>Robin of Gilwell / Jay Rudin
> On 5/8/06, willowjonbardc at juno.com wrote:
> Dear fellow bards
> As a Laurel I am having problems with the kingdom forms. The Static 
>Arts juding forms do not have a separate documentation section. The 
>documentation falls into the Authentic section. It is support for your 
>piece. I feel it is unfair to add that extra stress to performing artist 
>when it isn't added to static arts. I feel the authentic section is enough 
>and we should drop the extra documentation section.
> Mistress Willow de Wisp


>_______________________________________________
>Bards mailing list
>Bards at ansteorra.org
>http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/bards


_______________________________________________
Bards mailing list
Bards at ansteorra.org
http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/bards


		
---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ansteorra.org/pipermail/bards-ansteorra.org/attachments/20060510/044bc57f/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Bards mailing list